Tag Archive | heaven

Life Beyond Life?  What Explains Near-Death Experiences?

Life Beyond Life?  What Explains Near-Death Experiences?

As many of you know, I’m a hospice chaplain and experience the reality of death on a consistent basis.

Recently I’ve been reading about near-death experiences (NDEs). I also met a very dear lady who had an incredible and, as is often true, transformative NDE. She was very loving. She contributes her love to Jesus. She tells of drowning in the ocean and giving up hope when a loving presence she describes as Jesus embraces her. She had an overwhelming sense of peace and love as she had never experienced. She was later rescued and revived. She was never the same.

I myself have almost died in a car accident on Interstate 71. I went through the median and got hit by an oncoming semi-truck. (I want to interject here,  “Kids, don’t sleep and drive.”) 

I almost died, but that’s not the kind of near-death experience I’m talking about. Actually, in many “near-death experiences,” people actually die. That is, their heart stops for some period of time, there are no brain waves, or they’re pronounced dead. 

Very wild and interesting stuff. Here’s a summary of some of what I’ve learned about NDEs (not generated by AI).

Confirmation of Data Experienced During NDEs

NDEs are common.[1] Of course, common does not equal credible. But many people have had out-of-body experiences where they accurately report real-world events and sights while they were unconscious or clinically dead. People have reported data after they revived from being brain dead that medical science cannot explain. And many of these reports have been corroborated as accurate and factual.[2] 

“Many cases have been gathered in which dying persons were able to view individuals, events, or circumstances around them, or even in other places, with amazing accuracy after coming close to dying or being pronounced clinically dead. Some of the descriptions were of events that happened even while the patients were comatose. In other words, these subjects reported independently corroborated data that would not normally have been in the range of their senses even if they were fully conscious at the time.”[3]

Like, how did Maria know there was a specific left-footed tennis shoe on the third-story window ledge of the hospital after she was resuscitated?[4] Or what explains the lady who reported seeing a single red shoe on the top of the hospital, which was later confirmed to be there?[5] How did a patient know about specific goings-on in their home when they were flatlined and pronounced dead at the time? How did a blind person accurately describe specific visual details?[6] How have people recognized family members they never knew existed but were later confirmed to have died?

Or how do you explain Tony’s experience? He traveled from his home in Florida to Wisconsin for a complex open-heart surgery. Tony’s “heart was arrested for 30 minutes.” During this trauma, Tony had an NDE and reported correct observations regarding his wife in the hospital waiting room and was able to look in on his home in Florida over 1,200 miles away. These reports were confirmed later by discussions with the house sitter, their own observations when returning home to Florida, and were also investigated later by a physician.[7]

Or here’s another NDE example: “A woman who had both a flat EEG reading and no vital signs had been declared dead. But she spontaneously revived about three and one-half hours later… Then she reported that she had floated over her body during the resuscitation attempts. She precisely described not only the procedures used in her attempted rescue but also the number of persons who came into the hospital room, what they said (she even repeated a joke told to relieve the tension), and perhaps most interestingly, she described the designs on the doctors’ ties.”[8]

How can so many people report accurate real-world events and sights that transpired while they were unconscious or clinically dead? Perhaps an elaborate hoax? Or just a bunch of liars with super random guesses that just happen to be accurate? Perhaps something more sinister? 

Consistency across NDEs

While there’s no universally accepted definition of a near-death experience, a remarkable consistency exists in what people report. Here’s a breakdown of the common experiences that Dr. Jeffrey Long drew from data from thousands of verified NDE accounts gathered through detailed surveys:

  • Out-of-body experience: separation of consciousness from the physical body (75.4%)
  • Heightened senses (74.4% said “more conscious and alert than normal”)
  • Intense and generally positive emotions or feelings (76.2% “incredible peace”)
  • Passing into or through a tunnel (33.8%)
  • Encountering a mystical or brilliant light (64.6%)
  • Encountering other beings, either mystical beings or deceased relatives or friends (57.3%)
  • A sense of alteration of time or space (60.5%)
  • Life review (22.2%)
  • Encountering unworldly (“heavenly”) realms (52.2%)
  • Encountering or learning special knowledge (56%)
  • Encountering a boundary or barrier (31%)
  • A return to the body (58.5% were aware of a decision to return)[9]

Dr. Long explains that medical science fails to fully explain why people from vastly different cultures, languages, and religions report such similar and highly lucid sequences of events while clinically dead or unconscious.[10]

What accounts for the consistency of NDEs? If NDEs are a hoax, why are they consistent across cultures? 

Corroboration with the Christian Bible 

Interestingly, many aspects of NDEs are corroborated in the Bible. Actually, many think what Paul says in 2 Corinthians 12:1-3 (“whether in the body or out of the body”) describes an NDE. Some think the NDE may have happened when Paul was stoned and left for dead as recounted in Acts 14:19. Or it could have happened one of the times he was shipwrecked (2 Cor. 11:25). Of course, we don’t know. But what Paul relates in 2 Corinthians 12 has a lot of similarities with modern NDEs. 

Many NDEs fit with what the Bible says about the afterlife:

  • Many people experience a rapid, panoramic evaluation of their lives (Matt. 25:31; 2 Cor. 5:10). 
  • Enjoyment of beauty that is better than can be imagined (Is. 64:4; 1 Cor. 2:9).
  • Reunited with loved ones (2 Sam. 12:23; Jn. 14:1-3; 1 Thess. 4:13–18).
  • Experiences that communicate the relational love of God (Jn. 15:15, 17:3).
  • Overwhelming sense of peace and love (1 Cor. 13:8; 1 Jn. 4:8; 16; Is. 54:10; Jn. 14:27; Phil. 4:7). 
  • Some people have negative experiences akin to punishment (Gal. 6:8; 2 Thess. 1:9)[11]
  • Radiating and pervasive light (Rev. 21:23; 22:5).
  • Many encounter other beings (Rev. 22:9). 
  • Many note cessation of pain (Rev. 21:4).

If NDEs were influenced by one’s religious beliefs and background, you would expect there to be big differences in the content of NDEs across cultures. But that’s not the case. In Dr. Long’s review of over 500 NDEs from dozens of countries around the world, he found impressive similarities.[12] “The differences are in the explanation and the interpretation of the experience,”[13] and not the content of the NDEs.

If people—especially people from different cultures—report similar experiences and those experiences line up with a powerful and time-tested religious text, could their collaboration lend credibility to the reality of life after death? And could NDEs support the truthfulness of the Christian Bible? 

Conclusion

Many NDEs have outside confirmation of the data experienced during the NDE. Many people have had out-of-body experiences where they accurately report real-world events and sights while they were unconscious or clinically dead. There is also surprising consistency across NDEs. Many NDEs corroborate what the Christian Bible says about the afterlife. 

The phenomenon experienced during NDEs is medically inexplicable. NDEs challenge our understanding of consciousness, mortality, and the possibility of life beyond death. Do near-death experiences provide credible, scientific proof of an afterlife? Many believe so.

What do you think? Have you thought about life after death? What explains the prevalence of NDEs? 

Notes

[1] “NDE data have been presented in more than 100 peer-reviewed medical, psychological, and other reputable journals. Many millions of people claim to have experienced them. Documented cases of patients with neither measurable brain waves nor heartbeats have clearly reported rather incredible data during these times that were actually verified by others, both from their own vicinity as well as far away. Over 300 cases of highly evidenced NDEs have been reported.” (Gary R. Habermas, On the Resurrection, 951).

[2] Gary R. Habermas and J. P. Moreland, Beyond Death: Exploring the Evidence for Immortality, 156.

[3] Habermas and Moreland, Beyond Death, 157.

[4] John Burke, Imagine Heaven, 41-42.

[5] Gary Habermas, On the Resurrection, 974.

[6] “Other particularly interesting cases involve blind persons. A chemist, for example, after being blinded a year earlier in an accident, correctly reported the visual details surrounding his near-death experience. Other individuals who had been blind for years (and were even tested for blindness again afterward) accurately described the design and colors of clothing and jewelry worn by those around them when they almost died… These cases are not rare; they are unexpectedly common.” (Habermas and Moreland, Beyond Death, 158).

[7] Habermas, On the Resurrection, 975.

[8] Habermas and Moreland, Beyond Death, 161.

[9] Long and Perry, Evidence of the Afterlife: The Science of Near-Death Experiences.

[10] “It is fascinating to consider, therefore, that some of the most vivid memories these people had were of events that happened while their brains registered no known activity.” (Habermas and Moreland, Beyond Death, 160).

[11]  “Some studies have also mentioned negative experiences in NDEs, including ‘hellish’ ones, although it seems that some NDEr’s may still be reluctant to share their experiences” (Amirhossein Hashemi, Ali Akbar Oroojan, Maryam Rassouli, and Hadis Ashrafizadeh, “Explanation of Near-Death Experiences: A Systematic Analysis of Case Reports and Qualitative Research.”).

[12]  Jeffery Long, “Near-Death Experiences Evidence for Their Reality.”

[13] Hashemi, Oroojan, Rassouli, and Ashrafizadeh, “Explanation of Near-Death Experiences.”

Will sin be possible in heaven?

To answer the question will sin be possible in heaven, there are a number of passages we should look at. 

“…the assembly of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect“ (Hebrews 12:23). 

“…those whom He foreknew He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son…” (Romans 8:29).

“No longer will there be anything accursed, but the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and his servants will worship Him” (Revelation 22:3).

“…nothing unclean will ever enter it, nor anyone who does what is detestable or false, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s book of life” (Revelation 21:27).

“The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God. Never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God…” (Revelation 3:12).

“I will plant them on their land, and they shall never again be uprooted out of the land that I have given them…” (Amos 9:15).

Christians will be made “made perfect” (Heb. 12:23). They will be “conformed into the image” of Jesus (Rom. 8:29). It may be that Christians can sin, but won’t sin because they will not want to sin. 

When Christians see Jesus, they shall be like Him (1 John 3:2). That is the sense in which Christians will be unable to sin (non posse peccare, as Augustine said). Christians will be like Christ!

So, no. Ultimately, Christians will not be able to sin in heaven. But it won’t be from an external constraint but from internal renewal. 

Christians will finally completely have their affections rightly aligned with reality. Christians will love the LORD their God with all their heart, soul, mind, and strength. 

Faith or Flounder

“My steps had nearly slipped.
For I was envious of the arrogant
when I saw the prosperity of the wicked.”
Psalm 73:2-3

Our focus and our faith matter.

Wrong Focus = Destruction

It was when the psalmist was envious of people that had stuff that he didn’t have that he nearly fell. When we see a representation of the “good life” that we don’t have, it can make us discontent and even angry at God.

It makes me think of Instagram. Instagram is notorious at giving a very false lens on life. Not only are pictures edited and filtered, they’re staged. They’re set up beforehand so everything is just right. The pictures are also specifically picked to portray the perfect picture behind the perfect life.

If we focus on other people’s lives, or pictures of their “perfect” lives, it will often lead to discontentment. We will think they have it all. And we will think our life stinks.

That’s essentially what happened to the psalmist. “[Their] steps had nearly slipped.” Why? Because they were “envious of the arrogant when [they] saw the prosperity of the wicked” (Ps. 73:2-3).

Faltering faith can be a result of focus. The psalmist nearly slipped not because they began to doubt the existence of God. Nope. That’s not what it was. They began to doubt the goodness of God because someone else was apparently living the “good life;” living the life they themselves wanted to live.

There was no logical argument. The issue was “kardialogical,” from desire of the heart. The psalmist was envious, jealous of someone else’s prosperity, and upset that others have “no pangs until death” (v.4). That is what nearly caused the downfall. He thought, “All in vain have I kept my heart clean” (v. 13). It’s pointless because I don’t get the enjoyment I desire but only suffering (v. 14).  

Right Focus = Delight

The psalmist couldn’t understand and was tiring of considering what he thought was unfairness on God’s part (v. 16), until something happened. The psalmist “went into the sanctuary of God” (v. 17). Then his perspective radically shifted. That was when he “discerned their end” (v. 17). He saw things differently from the viewpoint of the coming Judgment. The wicked may enjoy life now but they will be “destroyed in a moment, swept away utterly by terrors” (v. 19).

The psalmist realized that though there may be suffering in this life, what is of utmost importance is the next life. The psalmist knew that after this life God would receive him to glory (v. 24). We have to have faith that that is true and focus on that truth or it will be our destruction. If we do have right focus, however, it will be our delight. The psalmist said, “There is nothing on earth that I desire besides you” (v. 25).

If we just focus on Instagram we’re going to want insta satisfaction. But there is a life that comes after this life. And it is eternal. As Jim Elliot said, “He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.” We need to have the right focus, a focus on eternity.

“He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.”

Jim Elliot

Let’s have focus on that truth. Let’s remember that our flesh and our heart will fail, but God is the strength of our hearts and our portion forever (v. 26). And let’s make the Lord God our refuge and let’s tell of His works (v. 28).

Living as Canceled Christians (a response to a response)

A reader of my previous post objected to some of what I wrote. Which of course is fine. I remain grateful that we have the freedom to do that. I’m also grateful for the opportunity it provides me to interact with some of his thoughts and critiques. So, here’s my response…

First, he said he didn’t know what “canceled Christians” means. It is a reference to the “popular practice of withdrawing support for (canceling) public figures… after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive. Cancel culture is generally discussed as being performed on social media in the form of group shaming” (dictionary.com). Christians are being shut down from sharing their biblically informed views (especially moral issues on sexuality) on social media and often in general conversation as well.

He said that “we are to invest much energy into this world.” I, of course, agree with that. The Bible is replete with examples calling us to do just that. One of the reasons it calls us to invest in this world is actually because of the coming of the next. Our eschatology (study of last things) is a goad to our ethics (e.g. Matt. 24:36ff; 25:13; Col. 3:1ff; 1 Thess. 5:1-2).

He also said that this world is not a “stinky tent. It’s God’s handiwork.” This world is not literally a stinky tent. The Bible doesn’t say that exactly. The Bible does, however, say that “in this tent we groan, longing to put on our heavenly dwelling… For while we are still in this tent, we groan, being burdened… we would rather be away from the body and at home with the Lord” (2 Cor. 5:2, 4, 8). It says, “the creation was subjected to futility… the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption… For we know that the whole creation has been groaning…” (Rom. 8:20, 21, 22 see also 2 Cor. 4:16-18). It thus seems to me that the world is a metaphorical “stinky tent.” It is not our final home. We should have a certain amount of longing for our “lasting city” (Heb. 13:14 cf. 2 Cor. 5:1; Jn. 14:2-3).

God’s creation does show His handiwork and it is an “expression of His creativity.” The first chapter of Genesis says six times that God’s creation is “good” and in the seventh and final announcement God says it’s “very good” (Gen. 1:31). That, however, is not the end of the story. It’s the beginning. Something sinister happens. The Fall (Gen. 3). And because of sin all manner of curse and chaos.

We live in a post-Genesis-3 world. So, while creation still attests to the goodness and creativity of God, it is also riddled with ruin because of sin. Jesus as promised in Genesis 3:15 is the one who finally remakes it. And He is the hope of the world.

I really appreciate that he says, “we are called to imperfectly participate, invest our gifts, to forgive.” That is very true. I am not sure why but it seems like he was led to believe that I would disagree with that truth. I am not sure why, however. No writing of any length can say everything, but especially a blog.[1] Yes, we are to “imperfectly participate, invest our gifts, to forgive.”

I actually believe it’s true that unless Christians live as the campers and exiles they are, they won’t participate, they won’t invest, and they won’t forgive as God would have them. It’s being focused on the Kingdom that makes us effective in whatever kingdom we find ourselves in. It’s the person who realizes the value of the treasure (i.e. all the goodness of the new creation) that will sacrifice all to gain it (Matt. 13:44); even if it means loving those who are sometimes unlovely.

That is why we must “set [our] hope fully on the grace that will be brought to [us] at the revelation of Jesus Christ” (1 Pet. 1:13). That, as Peter explains, will help us “love one another earnestly from a pure heart” (v. 22). It will help us “imperfectly participate, invest our gifts, to forgive.” It will help us with creation care and the Golden Rule.

As C.S. Lewis said,

If you read history you will find that the Christians who did most for the present world were precisely those who thought most of the next. It is since Christians have largely ceased to think of the other world that they have become so ineffective in this.

We can be so earthy minded that we’re no earthly good. And we won’t rightly love our neighbor if we only love ourselves. As we look to Christ and the heaven He’s purchased us we will more and more be drawn to live like Christ, to love and sacrifice ourselves for others (See e.g. 2 Cor. 3:18; 5:14-15; 2 Pet. 3:11-14).

Regarding his comment that “most [my] assertions are not contextualized or elaborated” and that what I wrote is “gobbledegook,”  I would say that the assertions in his response are also not “contextualized or elaborated.” And had they been his response would have been much longer. I would not say though that as a result what he wrote was “gobbledygook.” I looked up the definition of “gobbledygook” and apparently it means “language that is meaningless or is made unintelligible by excessive use of abstruse technical terms.” I’m not sure where my post earned the term “gobbledygook” but that is not a noun I want associated with anything I write. I actually wanted my post to be simple and thought provoking. Ironically, it seems to me that writings that are most contextualized and elaborated are the very writings that have the most likelihood of being gobbledygook.

I want to be clear, instructive, and helpful. And this gentleman’s comments are a spur to encourage me in that pursuit. For that I am thankful.

——

[1] Of course, I don’t expect the gentlemen’s brief response to be perfectly nuanced either. Covering every facet is not possible in a brief comment, blog post, or even a book-length treatment. We are both fallible and temporal. Scripture itself, if the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27) is not rightly considered, can seem lopsided. Matthew and Luke, James and Paul, however, are not at odds even if they are emphasizing different things and coming at issues from a different perspective.